Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should overrule or limit a 75-year-old ruling in a dissent published on Monday. The Supreme Court decided Feres v. United States in 1950. The ruling held that the U.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed during back surgery at a military hospital.
Trump, Supreme Court
· 4d · on MSN
Where the Supreme Court’s Conservatives Might Split on Trump’s Agenda
Supreme Court grants Trump request to pause USAID payments order
The administration faced a midnight deadline for disbursing nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. The order giving officials more time is only temporary.
· 2d · on MSN
Trump starts to lean on Supreme Court to save embattled executive actions
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, voting to uphold the conviction and death sentence, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett would have allowed a state appeals court to decide how to proceed.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams faces bribery charges, similar to those faced by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and is under pressure from President Trump’s administration to do his
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
6d
Tampa Free Press on MSNSupreme Court Denies Review Of Abortion Clinic Buffer Zone Case, Justice Thomas DissentsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a case challenging an Illinois city’s abortion clinic buffer zone ordinance, prompting a sharp dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas, who argued that the Court missed an opportunity to clarify the status of a controversial precedent that has long been criticized for undermining First Amendment
Conservative Supreme Court Justice Thomas Clarence has accused the Supreme Court majority of stretching the law "at every turn" to save a man from the death penalty. On February 25, the Supreme Court decided 5-3 to grant a new trial to Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip,
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic buffer zone laws, earning a fiery dissent from Justice Thomas.
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the case.
SCOTUS vacated the death sentence of an Oklahoma man named Richard Glossip. But we should take a closer look at the dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas.
The Supreme Court gave an Oklahoma death row inmate a new chance in the high-profile 1997 murder case. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results